SoftwareInReview covered what we believed to be the top Linux distributions in 2015. Clearly it’s time to review our findings. A lot of people did not agree with the choices, and, to be fair, it is hard to name a “best” version of Linux because the distributions are developed for many different purposes.
- Want an easy-to-use desktop?
Maybe Linux Mint or Ubuntu are the choices for you.
- Want an enterprise server?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLESE) have a lot of great features.
- Want a Linux distribution that lives in memory?
Puppy is a small distribution, (with a live-CD around 85MB) that can load completely into RAM. This distribution is very fast and now makes the top ten list of visited Linux distribution sites.
- Want a Linux distribution for gaming?
SuperGamer, based on VectorLinux, is a live DVD this is written for gaming on Linux. linuX-gamers Live DVD, based on Arch Linux, is another choice.
Our list of the best Linux distributions of 2011 was the most commented-on post we have had and it stirred up a lot of debate.
Continue reading “Best Linux Distributions”
SoftwareInReview looked at Linux distribution software. Listed below are the top seven Linux operating systems for 2011. Each program was ranked based on ease of installation, user friendliness, and availability of help/support.
The table below provides an overall rating given to each program. As you can see, each program can be downloaded for free. A short review of each program along with a link to the manufacturer’s web site can be accessed by clicking on the links provided.
Continue reading “2011 Best Linux Distributions”
Framing the Debate:
GNU/Linux has many, many graphical display options from basic window managers using the X Window system to complete desktop environments; however, most agree that the two top choices for graphical disply for Linux systems are GNOME and KDE.
The debate as to which one is better, GNOME or KDA, has been ongoing for years and still continues in 2009. Early this year, Jack Wallen wrote the article “10 reasons why GNOME is better than KDE” in which he concludes that “Prior to 4, I would have picked KDE over GNOME any day. But with the advent of 4, I have to say GNOME is far ahead of KDE in terms of design, stability, and usability.” (blog entry)
Bruce Byfield countered Jack’s argurment in March of 2009 writing “…should the GNOME project carry out its plans, the 2.30 release should generate its own excitement when released a year from now. But that’s the point: by the time GNOME is modernized, KDE will have had two years to perfect the 4.x releases. And, even when GNOME 2.3 finally arrives, it sounds like more of an overhaul than a complete rewriting, which makes its competitiveness questionable.” (blog entry)
Continue reading “With the coming of KDE 4.3, the old question comes back: which is better – KDE or GNOME?”